Modeling of High-Speed Ultrasonic Testing of Railway Rails in Track Inspection

Downloads

Authors

  • Sławomir Mackiewicz Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland ORCID ID 0000-0003-3826-5365
  • Zbigniew Ranachowski Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland ORCID ID 0000-0003-2447-4705
  • Tomasz Katz Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland ORCID ID 0000-0002-6542-2787
  • Tomasz Dębowski Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland ORCID ID 0000-0002-2394-7331
  • Grzegorz Starzyński Institute of Fundamental Technological Research Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland ORCID ID 0000-0002-5257-6461

Abstract

In the paper the theoretical modeling of ultrasonic testing of railway rails with high scanning speed is considered. The model for the calculation of the ultrasonic field generated by the ultrasonic transducers and the pulse echo amplitude received after wave reflection at the defect is developed. The model is based on well-established principles of elastodynamic theory: the Rayleigh–Sommerfeld integral, the Auld reciprocity relation, and the Kirchhoff approximation. It forms the basis for design of computer program to simulate ultrasonic inspections of railway rails with automated mobile systems. The major innovation introduced in the model is taking into account the high scanning speed of the ultrasonic probes over the rail head and the limited repetition rate of the ultrasonic system. The mentioned aspects of the high-speed rail testing require the revision of one of the basic paradigms of the current ultrasonic models, which assume that the scanning speed of the ultrasonic probe is negligible in comparison to the speed of ultrasonic waves propagating in the tested material. Actually, when scanning rails at a speed of 120 km/h, the ultrasonic probe can change its position up to 5 mm between transmitting and receiving ultrasonic pulses reflected from defects located in the rail foot. Such a shift in the probe position is not negligible and should be considered in calculations. As a consequence, the ultrasonic system’s slow repetition rate and fast scanning speed can make it less likely that certain rail flaws will be found. To quantitatively examine the severity of these phenomena, the new ultrasonic model and related simulation software was developed.

Keywords:

non-destructive testing, railway rails defects, testing of railway rails, automatic ultrasonic testing

References


  1. Auld B.A. (1973), Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids, p. 167, John Wiley & Sons.

  2. Auld B.A. (1979), General electromechanical reciprocity relations applied to the calculation of elastic waves scattering coefficients, Wave Motion, 1(1): 3–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2125(79)90020-9

  3. Calmon P., Lhemery A., Lecoeur-Taıbi I., Raillon R., Paradis L. (1998), Models for the computation of ultrasonic fields and their interaction with defects in realistic NDT configurations, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 180(3): 271–283, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00299-9

  4. Darmon M., Chatillon S. (2013), Main features of a complete ultrasonic measurement model: Formal aspects of modeling of both transducers radiation and ultrasonic flaws responses, Open Journal of Acoustics, 3(3A): 43–53, https://doi.org/10.4236/oja.2013.33A008

  5. Deschamps G.A. (1972), Ray techniques in electromagnetics, Proceedings of the IEEE, 60(9): 1022–1035, https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1972.8850

  6. European Committee for Standardization (2016), Railway applications – Infrastructure – Non-destructive testing on rails in track. Part 1: Requirements for ultrasonic inspection and evaluation principles (European Standard EN 16729-1:2016), CEN, Brussels.

  7. European Committee for Standardization (2018), Railway applications – Infrastructure – Non-destructive testing on rails in track. Part 3: Requirements for identifying internal and surface rail defects (European Standard EN 16729-3:2018), CEN, Brussels.

  8. Gengembre N., Lhemery A, (2000), Pencil method in elastodynamics: Application to ultrasonic field computation, Ultrasonics, 38(1–8): 495–499, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0041-624x(99)00068-2

  9. Heckel T., Casperson R., Ruhe S., Mook G. (2018), Signal processing for non-destructive testing of railway tracks, [in:] Proceedings of 44th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, 1949(1): 030005, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5031528

  10. Huang R., Schmerr L.W., Sedov A., Gray T.A. (2006), Kirchoff approximation revisited – Some new results for scattering in isotropic and anisotropic elastic solids, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, 17(3): 137–160, https://doi.org/10.1080/09349840600787956

  11. International Organization for Standardization (2020), Non-destructive testing – Characterization and verification of ultrasonic test equipment. Part 2: Probes (ISO Standard No. 2232-2:2020), https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/es/#iso:std:iso:22232:-2:ed-1:v1:en

  12. International Union of Railway (2002), Rail defects (UIC Code 712-R), 4th ed., https://www.scribd.com/document/338561091/UIC-Code-712-R-2002-Rail-Defects (access: 28.10.2025).

  13. Katz T., Mackiewicz S., Ranachowski Z., Kowalewski Z.L., Antolik Ł. (2021), Ultrasonic detection of transversal cracks in rail heads – Theoretical approach, Engineering Transactions, 69(4): 437–456, https://doi.org/10.24423/EngTrans.1695.20211220

  14. Kumar S. (2006), Study of rail breaks: Associated risks and maintenance strategies, Technical report, Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Lulea Railway Research Center (JVCT), Lulea University of Technology, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:995250/FULLTEXT01.pdf (access: 28.10.2025).

  15. Lopez-Sanchez A.L., Kim H.-J., Schmerr L.W.Jr., Sedov A. (2005), Measurement models and scattering models for predicting the ultrasonic pulse-echo response from side-drilled holes, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 24(3): 83–96, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-005-7658-4

  16. Mackiewicz S., Ranachowski Z., Katz T., Dębowski T., Starzyński G., Ranachowski P. (2024), Modeling of acoustic coupling of ultrasonic probes for high-speed rail track inspection, Archives of Acoustics, 49(2): 255–266, https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2024.148787

  17. Ono K. (2020a), A comprehensive report on ultrasonic attenuation of engineering materials, including metals, ceramics, polymers, fiber-reinforced composites, wood and rocks, Applied Sciences, 10(7): 2230, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072230

  18. Ono K. (2020b), Dynamic viscosity and transverse ultrasonic attenuation of engineering materials, Applied Sciences, 10(15): 5265, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155265

  19. Raillon R., Lecoeur-Taıbi I. (2000), Transient elastodynamic model for beam defect interaction: Application to nondestructive testing, Ultrasonics, 38(1–8): 527–530, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00067-0

  20. Schmerr L.W.Jr. (2016), Fundamentals of Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation. A modelling approach, 2nd ed., Springer Nature, Basel, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30463-2

  21. Thomas H.-M., Heckel T., Hanspach G. (2007), Advantage of a combined ultrasonic and eddy current examination for railway inspection trains, Insight, 49(6): 341–344, http://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2007.49.6.341

  22. Zumpano G., Meo M. (2006), A new damage detection technique based on wave propagation for rails, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43(5): 1023–1046, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.006

Other articles by the same author(s)