Archives of Acoustics, 42, 2, pp. 189–197, 2017
10.1515/aoa-2017-0021

Noise Elimination of Reciprocating Compressors Using FEM, Neural Networks Method, and the GA Method

Ying-Chun CHANG
Tatung University
Taiwan, Province of China

Min-Chie CHIU
Chung Chou University of Science and Technology
Taiwan, Province of China

Ji-Lin XIE
Tatung University
Taiwan, Province of China

Industry often utilizes acoustical hoods to block noise emitted from reciprocating compressors. However, the hoods are large and bulky. Therefore, to diminish the size of the compressor, a compact discharge muffler linked to the compressor outlet is considered. Because the geometry of a reciprocating compressor is irregular, COMSOL, a finite element analysis software, is adopted. In order to explore the acoustical performance, a mathematical model is established using a finite element method via the COMSOL commercialized package. Additionally, to facilitate the shape optimization of the muffler, a polynomial neural network model is adopted to serve as an objective function; also, a Genetic Algorithm (GA) is linked to the OBJ function. During the optimization, various noise abatement strategies such as a reverse expansion chamber at the outlet of the discharge muffler and an inner extended tube inside the discharge muffler, will be assessed by using the artificial neural network in conjunction with the GA optimizer. Consequently, the discharge muffler that is optimally shaped will decrease the noise of the reciprocating compressor.
Keywords: finite element method; polynomial neural network model; genetic algorithm; group method of data handling; reciprocating compressor; optimization
Full Text: PDF
Copyright © Polish Academy of Sciences & Institute of Fundamental Technological Research (IPPT PAN).

References

Chang Y.C., Chiu M.C., Cheng M.M. (2009), Optimum design of perforated plug mufflers using neural network and genetic algorithm, Proc. ImechE Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 223, 935–952.

Chang Y.C., Yeh L.J., Chiu M.C. (2004), Numerical studies on constrained venting system with side inlet/outlet mufflers by GA optimization, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 1, 1–11.

Cheremisinoff P.N., Cheremisinoff P.P. (1977), Industrial noise control handbook, Ann Arbor Science, Michigan.

Chiu M.C., Chang Y.C. (2009), Application of neural network and genetic algorithm to the optimum design of perforated tube mufflers, J. of Mechanics, 25, N7-N16.

Dreiman N., Collings D., Flora M.D. (2000), Noise reduction of fractional horse power hermetic reciprocating compressor, International Compressor Engineering Conference.

Gosavi S.S., Juge V.M., Nadgouda M.M. (2006), Optimization of suction muffler using taguchi’s method, International Compressor Engineering Conference.

Holland, J. (1975), Adaptation in natural and artificial system, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Ivakhnenko A.G. (1971), Polynomial theory of complex system, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cyber., 1, 4, 364-368.

Jong, D. (1975), An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems, Doctoral thesis, Dept Computer and Communication Sciences, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan.

Patrikar, A., Provence, J. (1996), Nonlinear system identification and adaptive control using polynomial networks, Math. Comput. Modeling, l23, 1/2, 159–173.

Roozen N.B., Oetelaar V.D.J. , Geerlings A., Vliegenthart T. (2009), Source identification and noise reduction of a reciprocating compressor; a case history, International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 14, 2, 90–98.

Suh K.H., Lee H., Oh W.S., Jung W.H. (1998), An analysis of the hermetic reciprocating compressor acoustic system, International Compressor Engineering Conference.

Wang C.N. (1992), The application of boundary element method in the noise reduction analysis for the automotive mufflers, Ph.D Thesis, Taiwan University.

Yeh L.J., Chang Y.C., Chiu M.C. (2006), Numerical studies on constrained venting system with reactive mufflers by GA optimization, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 65, 1165–1185.




DOI: 10.1515/aoa-2017-0021