Archives of Acoustics, 43, 4, pp. 581–592, 2018
10.24425/aoa.2018.125152

Detection and Recognition of Environmental Sounds by Musicians and Non-Musicians

Andrzej MIŚKIEWICZ
The Fryderyk Chopin University of Music
Poland

Teresa ROŚCISZEWSKA
The Fryderyk Chopin University of Music
Poland

Jan ŻERA
Warsaw University of Technology
Poland

Jacek MAJER
The Fryderyk Chopin University of Music
Poland

Barbara OKOŃ-MAKOWSKA
The Fryderyk Chopin University of Music
Poland

The article reports three experiments conducted to determine whether musicians possess better ability of recognising the sources of natural sounds than non-musicians. The study was inspired by reports which indicate that musical training develops not only musical hearing, but also enhances various non-musical auditory capabilities. Recognition and detection thresholds were measured for recordings of environmental sounds presented in quiet (Experiment 1) and in the background of a noise masker (Experiment 2). The listener’s ability of sound source recognition was inferred from the recognition-detection threshold gap (RDTG) defined as the difference in signal level between the thresholds of sound recognition and sound detection. Contrary to what was expected from reports of enhanced auditory abilities of musicians, the RDTGs were not smaller for musicians than for non-musicians. In Experiment 3, detection thresholds were measured with an adaptive procedure comprising three interleaved stimulus tracks with different sounds. It was found that the threshold elevation caused by stimulus interleaving was similar for musicians and non-musicians. The lack of superiority of musicians over non-musicians in the auditory tasks explored in this study is explained in terms of a listening strategy known as casual listening mode, which is a basis for auditory orientation in the environment.
Keywords: environmental sounds; detection threshold; recognition threshold
Full Text: PDF
Copyright © Polish Academy of Sciences & Institute of Fundamental Technological Research (IPPT PAN).

References

Abouchacra K., Łętowski T., Gothie J. (2007), Detection and recognition of natural sounds, Archives of Acoustics, 32, 3, 603–616.

Andringa T., Pals C. (2009), Detection and recognition threshold of sound sources in noise, Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci09, pp. 1798–1803.

Bogusz-Witczak E., Skrodzka E., Turkowska H. (2015), Influence of musical experience of blind and visually impaired young persons on performance in selected auditory tasks, Archives of Acoustics, 40, 3, 337–349.

Carello C., Anderson K.L., Kinkler-Peck A.J. (1998), Perception of object length by sound, Psychological Science, 9, 211–214.

Chan A.S., Ho Y.C., Cheung M.C. (1998), Music training improves verbal memory, Nature, 396, 128.

Chartrand J.-P., Belin P. (2006), Superior voice timbre processing in musicians, Neuroscience Letters, 405, 164–167.

Chion M. (1994), Audio-vision: Sound on screen, Columbia University Press, New York.

Fechner G.T. (1860), Elemente der Psychophysik, Breitkopf & Härterl, Leipzig.

Fine P.A., Moore B.C.J. (1993), Frequency analysis and musical ability, Music Perception, 11, 39–53.

Fluitt K., Gaston J., Karna V., Letowski T. (2010), Feasibility of audio training for identification of auditory signatures of small arms fire, Report ARLTR-5413, Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD.

Gaver W.W. (1993a), What in the worlds do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception, Ecological Psychology, 5, 1–29.

Gaver W.W. (1993b), How do we hear in the world? Explorations in ecological acoustics, Ecological Psychology, 5, 285–313.

Green D.M., Swets J.A. (1966), Signal detection theory and psychophysics, New York: Wiley.

Gygi B. (2001), Factors in the identification of environmental sounds, Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Indiana University.

Gygi B., Kidd G.R., Watson C.S. (2007), Similarity and categorization of environmental sounds, Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 839–855.

Herholz S.C., Boh B., Pantev C. (2011), Musical training modulates encoding of higher-order regularities in the auditory cortex, European Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 524–529.

Jakobson L., Cuddy L., Kilgour A. (2003), Time tagging: A key to musicians’ superior memory, Music Perception, 20, 307–213.

Lakatos S., McAdams S., Caussé R. (1997), The representation of auditory source characteristics: Simple geometric form, Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 1180–1191.

Lee Y., Lu M., Ko H. (2007), Effects of skill training on working memory capacity, Learning and Instruction, 17, 336–344.

Leek M.R., Watson C.S. (1984), Learning to detect auditory pattern components, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 1037–1044.

Levitt H. (1971), Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467–477.

Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. (2005), Detection theory: a user’s guide, 2nd Ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.

Miśkiewicz A., Letowski T. (2014), Timbre Solfege training in automotive industry, Proceedings of the 7th Forum Acusticum, Kraków.

Musacchia G., Sams M., Skoe E., Kraus N. (2007), Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15894–15898.

Myers L.L., Letowski T.R., Abouchacra K.S., Kalb J.T., Haas E.C. (1996), Detection and recognition of octave-band sound effects, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 346–357.

Oxenham A.J., Fligor B.J., Mason C.R., Kidd G., Jr. (2003), Informational masking and musical training, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 1543–1549.

Pantev C., Ross B., Fujioka, T., Trainor L.J., Schutte M., Schulz M. (2007), Music and learninginduced cortical plasticity, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 438–450.

Parbery-Clark A., Skoe E., Lam C., Kraus N. (2009), Musician enhancement for speech in noise, Ear and Hearing, 30, 653–661.

Pastore R.E., Flint J.D., Gaston J.R., Solomon M.J. (2008), Auditory event perception: the source – perception loop for posture in human gait, Perception and Psychophysics, 70, 13–29.

Preis A., Klawiter A. (2005), The audition of natural sounds – its levels and relevant experiments, Proceedings of Forum Acusticum, Kraków, pp. 1595–1599.




DOI: 10.24425/aoa.2018.125152