10.24425/aoa.2019.129730
Evaluation of Noise Exposure and Hearing Threshold Levels Among Call Centre Operators
Questionnaire inquiry aimed at collecting personal data, the information on ommunication headset usage habits, self-assessment of hearing ability and identification of risk factors for noise-induced hearing loss were also carried out. Sound pressure levels generated by the communication headset were determined using the artificial ear technique specified in CSA Z107.56-13 (2013) standard. The background noise prevailing in offices was also measured according to PN-N-01307 (1994) and PN-EN ISO 9612 (2011).
Personal daily noise exposure levels in call centre operators varied from 66 to 86 dB (10–90th percentile). About half of the study subjects had normal hearing in the standard frequencies (from 250 to 8000 Hz) in both ears, while only 27.1% in the extended high-frequencies (9–16 kHz). Moreover, both high-frequency and speech-frequency hearing losses were observed in less than 10% of audiograms, while the extended high-frequency threshold shift was noted in 37.1% of analysed ears. The hearing threshold
levels of call centre operators in the frequency of 0.25–11.2 kHz were higher (worse) than the expected median values for equivalent (due to age and gender) highly screened population specified in ISO 7029 (2017). Furthermore, they were also higher than predicted for 500–4000 Hz according to ISO 1999 (2013) based on the results of noise exposure evaluation.
References
AS/NZS 1269.1:2005, Occupational noise management – Measurement and assessment of noise immission and exposure. Standards Australia / Standards New Zealand, Wellington.
Ayugi J., Loyal P., Mugwe P., Nyandusi M. (2015), Demographic patterns of acoustic shock syndrome as seen in a large call centre, Occupational Medicine and Health Affairs, 3, 4, 212.
Beyan A.C., Dermiral Y., Cimrin A.H., Ergor A. (2016), Call center and noise induced hear-ing loss. Noise and Health, 18,113–116.
Coles R.R., Lutman M.E., Buffin J.T. (2000), Guidelines on diagnosis of noise-induced hear-ing loss for medical purposes. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences, 25, 264–273.
Corroll Y.I., Eichwald J., Scinicariello F., et al. (2017), Vital signs: Noise-induced hearing loss among adults —United States 2011–2012, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66, 5, 139–144.
CSA Z107.56-13:2013, Measurement of noise exposure. Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga.
CSA Z107.56-18:2018, Measurement of noise exposure. Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga
Directive 2003/10/EC of European Parliament and of the Council of 6 February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks aris-ing from physical agents (noise) (17th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), Official Journal of European Union, L42/38, 38–44.
El-Bestar S.F., El-Helaly M.E., Khashaba E.O. (2010), Prevalence and risk factors of senso-ry-neural hearing loss among telephone operators. Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medi-cine, 34, 1, 113–127, https://doi.org/10.21608/ejom.2010.691
IEC 61672-1:2013, Electroacoustics – Sound level meters – Part 1: Specifications. Interna-tional Electrotechnical Commission/Technical Specifications, Geneva, Switzerland.
IEC 60318-4:2010, Electroacoustics – Simulators of human head and ear – Part 4:
Occluded-ear simulator for the measurement of earphones coupled to the ear by means of ear inserts. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO 1999:2013, Acoustics Estimation of noise-induced hearing loss. International Organiza-tion for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO 7029:2017, Acoustics – Statistical distribution of hearing thresholds related to age and gender. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
ITU-T P.57. Series P. Terminals and subjective and objective assessment methods - Artificial Ears. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
Mazlan R., Saim L., Thomas A., Said R., Liyab B. (2002), Ear infection and hearing loss among headphone users, Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 9, 2, 17–22.
Nassrallah F.G., Giguere C., Dajani H.R., Ellaham N.N. (2016), Comparison of direct meas-urement methods for headset noise exposure in the workplace, Noise & Health, 18, 81, 62–77, https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.178479
Ordinance issued by the Minster of Labour and Social Policy of 12 June 2018 on maximum admissible concentration and maximum admissible intensity values for agents harmful to human health in the work environment [in Polish], J. Law, No. 0, item 1286.
Patel J.A., Broughton K. (2002), Assessment of the noise exposure of call centre operators, Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 46, 8, 653–661.
Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M., Zaborowski K., Zamojska-Daniszewska M., Dudarewicz A., Rutkowska-Kaczmarek P., (2019), Evaluation of noise exposure and risk of hearing impair-ment in employees using communication headsets or headphones [in Polish], Medycyna Pracy, 70, 1, 27–52.
Peretti A., Pedrielli F., Baiamonte M., Farina A. (2003), Headphone Noise: Occupational Noise Exposure Assessment for Communication Personnel, Proceedings of 5th European
Planeau V. (2005), Noise hazards associated with the call centre industry, Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité, Vandoeuvre.
PN-EN ISO 11904-1:2008, Acoustics – Determination of sound immission from sound sources placed close to the ear. Part 1: Technique using a microphone in a real ear (MIRE technique) [in Polish], Polish Committee for Standardization, Warsaw, 2008.
PN-EN ISO 11904-2:2009, Acoustics – Determination of sound immission from sound sources placed close to the ear. Part 2: Technique Using a Manikin (Manikin Technique) [in Polish], Polish Committee for Standardization, Warsaw, 2009. [in Polish]
PN-EN ISO 9612:2011, Acoustics – Determination of occupational noise exposure – Engi-neering method [in Polish], Polish Committee for Standardization, Warsaw, 2011.
PN-EN 61672-1:2014-03, Electroacoustics. Sound level meters. Part 1: Specifications [in Polish], Polish Committee for Standardization, Warsaw, 2011.
PN-EN ISO 8253-1:2011, Acoustics Audiometric test methods Part 1: Pure-tone air and bone conduction audiometry [in Polish], Polish Committee for Standardization, War-saw, 2011.
PN-N-01307:1994, Noise Permissible values of noise in the workplace. Requirements re-lating to measurement s[in Polish], Polish Committee for Standardization, Warsaw, 1994.
Porto M.A., Gahyva D.L., Lauris J.R., Lopes A.C. (2004), Audiometric evaluation in extend-ed high frequencies of individuals exposed to occupational noise [in Portuguese], Pro Fono, 16, 237-250.
Smagowska, B. (2010), Noise at workplaces in the call center, Archives of Acoustics, 35, 2, 253–264, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10168-010-0024-2
Smagowska B., Mikulski W., Radosz J. (2012), Assessment of noise exposure at call center workplaces throughout measurement method and MIRE technique [in Polish], Bezpieczeńst-wo Pracy, 10, 24–27.
Somma G., Pietroiusti A., Magrini A., Coppetta L., Ancona C., Gardi S., Messina M., Berga Maschi A. (2008), Extended high frequency audiometry and noise induced hearing loss in cement workers, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 51, 452–462.
Sulaiman A.H., Husain R., Seluakumaran K. (2015), Hearing risk among young personal listening device users: Effect at high-frequency and extended high-frequency audiogram thresholds, Journal of International Advanced Otology, 11, 104–109.
Venet T, Bey A, Campo P, Ducourneau J, Mifsud Q, Hoffmann C, et al. (2018), Auditory fatigue among call dispatchers working with headsets, International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 31, 217–226.
Vergara F.E., Steffani J., Gerges N.S., Pedroso M.A. (2006), Uncertainties assessment of noise dose for telemarketing operators (Headphone Users), Proceedings of XVIII IMEKO World Congress 2006, Rio de Janerio, Brazil.
Westcott M. (2006), Acoustic shock injury (ASI), Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum, 556, 54–58, https://doi.org/10.1080/03655230600895531.
DOI: 10.24425/aoa.2019.129730