Laboratory Evaluation of Underwater Acoustic Attenuation Provided by Air Bubble Curtains

Downloads

Authors

  • Alfio Yori Instituto de Acustica, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile
  • Jose Luis Barros Instituto de Acustica, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile
  • Rodrigo Torres Instituto de Acustica, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile
  • Felipe Figueroa Instituto de Acustica, Universidad Austral de Chile, Chile

Abstract

Air bubble curtains are widely used in Chilean salmon farming to protect fish from water pollutants. Due to new requirements from the Chilean Environmental Assessment Service, their use for underwater noise mitigation has become very important. This study aimed to evaluate the acoustic attenuation provided by a type of curtain widely used in salmon farming and seawater desalination under laboratory conditions, obtaining results independent of the conditions encountered in field work. This allowed for comparative measurements of different bubble curtain configurations. This study presents the results of an acoustic evaluation of underwater sound attenuation provided by different bubble curtain configurations, conducted in the test channel of the Engineering Department at the Universidad Austral de Chile. The parameter evaluated was insertion loss IL. It was found that the bubble curtains evaluated provided a broadband insertion loss between 11 dB and 12 dB in the simplest configuration and an Insertion Loss IL per third-octave band equal to or greater than 10 dB. A 10 dB attenuation in the source level represents a significant reduction in the area of acoustic impact, reducing the physiological damage distances for the marine mammal species considered by at least 78.4%.

Keywords:

Air-bubble curtain, underwater sound attenuation, reduction of physiological risk, underwater noise control

References


  1. Beelen S., Nijhof M., de Jong C., van Wijngaarden L., Krug D. (2025), Bubble curtains for noise mitigation: One vs two, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 157(2): 1336–1355, https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035817

  2. Bellmann M.A. (2014), Overview of existing noise mitigation systems for reducing pile-driving noise, [in:] Inter-Noise and Noise-Con Congress and Conference Proceedings, 249: 2544–2554.

  3. Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht [DAHG] (2014), Guidance to manage the risk to marine mammals from man-made sound sources in Irish waters.

  4. Department of Planning, Transportation and Infrastructure [DPTI] (2012), Underwater pilling noise guide, Government of South Australia.

  5. Dahne M., Tougaard J., Carstensen J., Rose A., Nabe-Nielsen J. (2017), Bubble curtains attenuate noise from offshore wind farm construction and reduce temporary habitat loss for harbour porpoises, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 580: 221–237, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12257

  6. Environmental Assessment Service [SEA] (2022), Evaluation criteria in the Environmental Impact Assessment System (SEIA): Prediction and evaluation of underwater noise impacts [in Spanish: Criterio de evaluacion en el sistema de evaluacion de impacto ambiental SEIA: Prediccion y evaluacion de impactos por ruido submarino].

  7. Fahy F.J. (2001), Foundations of Engineering Acoustics, Elsevier Press.

  8. Göttsche K.M., Juhl P.M., Steinhagen U. (2013), Numerical prediction of underwater noise reduction during offshore pile driving by a small bubble curtain, [in:] Proceedings Internoise: Noise Control for Quality of Life.

  9. Hall M.V. (1989), A comprehensive model of wind generated bubbles in the ocean and predictions of the effects on sound propagation at frequencies up to 40 kHz, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86(3): 1103–1117, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398102

  10. Jastrzębski S. (2007), Application of time reversal technique in shallow water environment, Archives of Acoustics, 32(4(S)): 319–324.

  11. Joint Nature Conservation Committee [JNCC] (2010), Statutory nature conservation agency protocol for minimising the risk injury to marine mammals from piling noise, Aberdeen, UK.

  12. Koschinski S., Lüdemann K. (2013), Development of Noise Mitigation Measures in Offshore Wind Farm Construction, Federal Agency for Nature Conservation.

  13. Khalilabadi M.R. (2022), 2D modeling of wave propagation in shallow water by the method of characteristics, Archives of Acoustics, 47(3): 407–412, https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2022.142014

  14. Lippert T., Ainslie M., von Estorff O. (2018), Pile driving acoustics made simple: Damped cylindrical spreading model, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(10): 310–317, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5011158

  15. Lucke K., Lepper P.A., Blanchet M.A., Siebert U. (2011), The use of an air bubble curtain to reduce the received sound levels for harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena), The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(5): 3406–3412, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3626123

  16. Lucke K., Siemensma M. (2013), International regulations on the impact of pile driving noise on marine mammals – A literature review, Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies.

  17. McKenzie C. (2015), Smålandsfarvandet offshore wind farm underwater noise, Technical report, Energinet.dk.

  18. Medwin H. (2005), Sounds in the Sea: From Ocean Acoustics to Acoustical Oceanography, Cambridge University Press.

  19. Merck T., Werner S., Koschinski S., Ludemann K. (2014), Inventory of measures to mitigate the emission and environmental impact of underwater noise, Technical report, OSPAR Commission.

  20. MMO (2015), Modelled mapping of continuous underwater noise generated by activities. A report produced for the Marine Management Organization, MMO Project No: 1097.

  21. Molnar M., Buehler D., Oestman R., Reyff J., Pommerenck K., Mitchell B. (2020), Technical guidance for the assessment of hydroacoustic effects of pile driving on fish, Division of Environmental Analysis California Department of Transportation.

  22. Möser M., Barros J.L. (2004), Acoustic Engineering, Theory and Applications [in Spanish: Ingeniería Acústica, Teoría y Aplicaciones], Springer.

  23. National Marine Fisheries Service [NMFS] (2018), Revisions to: Technical guidance for assessing the effects of anthropogenic sound on marine mammal hearing (Version 2.0): Underwater thresholds for onset of permanent and temporary threshold shifts, U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-59.

  24. National Marine Fisheries Service (2021), Guidelines for non-lethally deterring marine mammals.

  25. National Marine Fisheries Service (2024), Update to: Technical guidance for assessing the effects of anthropogenic sound on marine mammal hearing (Version 3.0): Underwater and in-air criteria for onset of auditory injury and temporary threshold shifts, U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-71.

  26. Nedwell J.R., Edwards B., Turnpenny A.W.H., Gordon J. (2004), Fish and marine mammal audiograms: A summary of available information, Subacoustech Report ref: 534R0214.

  27. Nedwell J.R. et al. (2007), A validation of the dBht as a measure of the behavioural and auditory effects of underwater noise, Subacoustech Report No. 534R1231.

  28. Nehls G., Betke K., Eckelmann S., Ros M. (2007), Assessment and costs of potential engineering solutions for the mitigation of the impacts of underwater noise arising from the construction of offshore windfarms, (Report No. ENG-01-2007), Report by BioConsult SH. Report for Collaborative Offshore Wind Research into the Environment (COWRIE).

  29. Nehls G., Rose A., Diederichs A., Bellmann M., Pehlke H. (2015), Noise mitigation during pile driving efficiently reduces disturbance of marine mammals, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 875: 755–762, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_92

  30. Novarini C., Keiffer R.S., Norton G.V. (1998), A model for variations in the range and depth dependence of the sound speed and attenuation induced by bubble clouds under wind-driven sea surfaces, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 23(4): 423–438, https://doi.org/10.1109/48.725236

  31. Parvin J., Nedwell J.R. (1995), Underwater sound perception and the development of an underwater noise weighting scale, Underwater Technology, 21(1): 12–19, https://doi.org/10.3723/175605495783328836

  32. Qi C., Hu Z., Wang S., Jiang Z., Wu H., Yin Z. (2021), Study on the propagation law of water hammer wave in underwater blasting and the reducing effect of air curtain on water hammer wave, Shock and Vibration, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9994071

  33. Richardson J., Greene C.R., Malme C.I., Thomson D.H. (1995), Marine Mammals and Noise, Academic Press Inc., New York.

  34. Robinson P., Lepper P.A., Hazelwood R.A. (2014), Good practice guide for underwater noise measurement, National Measurement Office, Marine Scotland, The Crown Estate, NPL Good Practice Guide No. 133.

  35. Rodkin R., Pommerenck K. (2014), Caltrans compendium of underwater sound data from pile driving, [in:] Inter-Noise 2014.

  36. Rustemeier J., Griesmann T., Rolfes R. (2012), Underwater sound mitigation of bubble curtains with different bubble size distributions, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 17(1): 070055, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4772936

  37. Strietman J., Michels R., Leemans E. (2018), Measures to reduce underwater noise and beach litter: An assessment of potential additional measures for the Netherlands, Wageningen Economic Research, Report 2018-087, https://doi.org/10.18174/457443

  38. Tsouvalas A. (2020), Underwater noise emission due to offshore pile installation: A review, Energies, 13(12): 3037, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123037

  39. Urick J. (2010), Principle of Underwater Sound, 3rd ed., Peninsula Publishing.

  40. URS (2011), Report marine noise assessment, Northern Territory Department of Lands and Planning, Australia.

  41. Werner (2010), Towards a precautionary approach for regulation of noise introduction in the marine environment from pile driving [in German], Federal Environmental Agency, Stralsund, Germany.

  42. Würsig B., Greene C.R., Jefferson T.A. (2000), Development of an air bubble curtain to reduce underwater noise of percussive piling, Marine Environmental Research, 49(1): 79–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-1136(99)00050-1

  43. Yori F. (2018), Underwater assessment of anthropogenic noise sources using a field recording method, Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 104(1): 13–24, https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.919141